Milby v. Mears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court “confine[s] itself to errors pointed out in the briefs and will not search the record for errors.”
• noting that “a reviewing court will . . . confine itself to errors pointed out in the briefs and will not search the record for errors.”
• noting appellee suffered no prejudice from appellant discussing an issue in a reply brief which was not raised in the initial appellant brief since appellee brief also discussed same issue
• “An appellant’s failure to discuss particular errors in his brief is the same as if no brief at all had been filed on those issues.”
• \[T]he reply brief is not a device for raising new issues . . . .\
• “a reviewing court will generally confine itself to errors pointed out in the briefs and will not search the record for errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).