Milbourn v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to imply a private right of action at summary judgment because such a right was not necessary to effectuate the policy of the statute
• finding no protected activity where internal policy compliance was not a condition of government payment
• construing ORS 659A.199 to require only an employee’s subjective good faith belief
• under Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.199(1), “[i]f the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut the inference of retaliation by offering a legitimate, non- discriminatory reason for the employee’s termination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).