Skip to main content
· 4/1/1983

Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Citations

  • 332 N.W.2d 160
  • 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding employee’s use of company car permissive even though it clearly exceeded express limitations employer placed on use of the car
  • finding permissive use even though vehicle was used for personal reasons and in a manner that exceeded the owner’s express limitations on the driver’s use
  • finding employer’s liability omnibus coverage was primary and coverage under employee’s policies on his personal vehicles was secondary or excess
  • \the initial permission rule is said to be supported by the weight of authority.\
  • considering permissive use under omnibus clause of uninsured motorist coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.