Milantoni v. Berardino

Citations

• 56 Pa. Super. 1
• 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 31

Syllabus

<p>Master and servant — Suit for wages — Evidence—Case for jury.</p> <p>1. In an action for wages the case is for the jury where the plaintiff testifies that she worked for sixteen months at the defendant’s place of business under the direction of the defendant’s manager, and with the full knowledge and approval of the defendant, although her testimony is flatly contradicted by both the defendant and his manager.</p> <p>2. In such a case a judgment for the plaintiff will not be reversed because the manager was called to testify under cross-examination where the record shows that the witness was not permitted by the court to testify about anything in dispute; nor can the trial judge be convicted of error in refusing to admit in evidence the record of a suit brought by plaintiff’s husband against the defendant where there is nothing in such record to throw light upon the plaintiff’s own claim for</p>