Milan Schultz v. Fred Baumgart, Chief, Waukesha Fire Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \it is not the task of this [federal] court to enforce in every procedural detail the elaborate requirements of [state law]\
• explaining that “it is not the task of this [federal] court to enforce in every procedural detail the elaborate requirements of [state law]”
• affirming summary judgment for some individual defendants because \the claimed deprivation could not have occurred at their direction or with their express consent\
• affirming summary judgment for some individual defendants because “the claimed depriva- tion could not have occurred at their direction or with their No. 16-1335 5 express consent”
• ex- plaining that “it is not the task of this [federal] court to enforce in every procedural detail the elaborate requirements of [state law]”
• ex- plaining that “it is not the task of this [federal] court to enforce in every procedural detail the elaborate requirements of [state law]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).