Milakovich v. United Statescis-orlando

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing no constitutional flaw with “a warrant authorizing a GPS device that enables police to track the location of a moving car” no matter where it goes
• rejecting argument that phone- tracking order failed Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement because it allowed agents “to follow the phones wherever they went”
• describing location data as “the evidence to be acquired”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).