· 5/15/2001
Federal Case
Citations
- 251 F.3d 604
- 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1065
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 9249
- 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excluding unmar‐ ried persons from dependent benefits resulted in “distinct” savings
- excluding unmar‐ ried persons from dependent benefits resulted in “distinct” savings
- excluding unmarried persons from dependent benefits resulted in \distinct\ savings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.