Mil-Spec Contractors, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “oral agreement was a modification of the contract, since it increased the amount the government would pay”
• “Unless and until there was a binding modification to which both Mil-Spec and the contracting officer had agreed in writing, there could not be a binding modification of the contract. The oral agreement . . . could not and did not constitute a valid accord and satisfaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).