Mikus v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert testimony that future medical treatment is required is sufficient to warrant a future-medical-expense instruction
• holding that plaintiff need only show “some” evidence—established with reasonable certainty—of future damages
• if the record discloses a substantial factual dispute arising from the evidence, the court has no power to grant a motion for JNOV
• the “some evidence” standard described in LaFever is a “modest” threshold
• the “some evidence” standard described in LaFever is a “modest” threshold

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).