Mikkilineni v. Penn National Mutual Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “plaintiff has filed similar claims repeatedly” forcing the “defendants to spend resources litigating previously-resolved claims” as appropriately harassing in nature to warrant an injunction
• finding that “forcing the defendants to spend resources litigating previously-resolved claims” constitutes harassment
• considering whether the defendants “fe[lt] harassed” based on the allegations in their motion for a pre-filing injunction
• barring plaintiff from filing in this court without leave
• barring plaintiff from filing in this court without leave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).