Skip to main content
· 6/26/1984

Mikhail Matsibekker v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services of the United States

Citations

  • 738 F.2d 79
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using date of claimant’s visit to the SSA office as date of actual notice when claimant never received notice by mail
  • noting “[r]ather than commencing on the date notice of decision is mailed to the claimant, the sixty day period starts from the time notice is received by the claimant”
  • noting “[r]ather than commencing on the date notice of decision is mailed to the claimant, the sixty day period starts from the time notice is received by the claimant” (emphasis in original)
  • rebutting 5-day presumption where evidence that defendant mailed the notice later
  • a plaintiff successfully rebutted the five-day presumption with evidence that defendant mailed notice later
  • rebutting five-day presumption with evidence that defendant mailed notice later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Timbers, Van Graafeiland Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.