Skip to main content
· 5/24/1994

Mike's Sign Co. v. Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 642 A.2d 634
  • 164 Pa. Commw. 292
  • 1994 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In a hearing on the revocation of a permit for a nonconforming outdoor advertising device, the Hearing Officer may believe all, part, or none of an expert witness’ testimony.
  • “[W]here the Court cannot say as a matter of law that the testimony of a witness is contrary to scientific principles or the laws of nature, the question of the conflict in the evidence is still for the fact-finder to resolve” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Friedman, Porta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.