Mikell v. Marriott International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s formal complaint “could not serve as a basis for a retaliation claim” because it was filed after he was suspended and subsequently terminated
• applying McDonnell Douglas framework to claims under Title VII, § 1981, and the PHRA
• “Complaints must be specific enough to notify management of the particular type of discrimination at issue in order to constitute ‘protected activity’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).