Skip to main content
· 4/3/1986

Mikarovski v. Wesson

Citations

  • 491 N.E.2d 864
  • 142 Ill. App. 3d 193
  • 96 Ill. Dec. 585
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under the circumstances of this case, where the trial court was not apprised of the nature of the proposed testimony, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for continuance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unverzagt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.