Miguez v. Ledet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statutory authority “ ‘allows the court ... to restrict the occasions for intervention during contract performance to those involving a fundamental question of contract interpretation or a special need for early resolution of a legal issue’ ”
• contesting an offset claim decision based on a savings guarantee provision in the contract
• discussing the 1992 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) and Alliant
• “As amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) contemplates suits in this Court for declaratory judgments on nonmon-etary claims.”
• “As amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) contemplates suits in this Court for declaratory judgments on nonmonetary claims.”
• “[A]n appeal to an agency board of contract appeals is considered an ‘absolute nullity’ when such board lacks jurisdiction over the matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).