Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes v. Evangelina Lopez Guzman Zaragoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding expert testimony based on an interview with defendant and defendant’s criminal history was sufficient to show that defendant had “a mental abnormality and had serious difficulty controlling his behavior”
• concluding expert testimony based on an interview with defendant and defendant’s criminal history was sufficient to show that defendant had “a mental abnormality and had serious difficulty controlling his behavior”
• concluding expert testimony based on an interview with defendant and defendant’s criminal history was sufficient to show that defendant had “a mental abnormality and had serious difficulty controlling his behavior”
• concluding expert testimony based on an interview with defendant and defendant’s criminal history was sufficient to show that defendant had “a mental abnormality and had serious difficulty controlling his behavior”
• considering actuarial assessments along with an expert’s clinical judgment to find substantial evidence supporting a finding that the respondent was a sexually violent predator
• noting “that the fact finder was free to accept the testimony of the State’s expert instead” of the respondent’s in determining the mental abnormality question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).