Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 5/17/2007
Miguel v. State
Citations
- 924 A.2d 3
- 2007 R.I. LEXIS 56
- 2007 WL 1740268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] derivative complaint must plead facts specific to each director[.]” (alterations added; emphasis in original)
- denying appeal on res judicata grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-29· cited 40×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-12-02· cited 26×
- Ferrell v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-06-08· cited 19×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-06-27· cited 18×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-11-02· cited 12×
- State v. John S. MiguelSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2014-11-10· cited 1×
- Christopher Thornton v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2025-04-01
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MattatallSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1992-02-21· cited 87×
- Carillo v. MoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-07-21· cited 31×
- Vorgvongsa v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-12-03· cited 26×
- Miguel v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-06-08· cited 20×
- Figueroa v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-05-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.