Miguel V. Rodriguez v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that any error under Minn.R.Crim.P. 26.03, subd. 19(2) necessarily is prejudicial error requiring new trial
• judge told defendant, “I think you should ask questions. If you want to testify later on you may.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).