Skip to main content
· 12/24/1986

Miguel Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L., Assignee of S. Margherita S.P.A.

Citations

  • 808 F.2d 46
  • 1 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1483
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Supporting the proposition that a registrant “has knowingly attempted to mislead the [Patent and Trademark Office]” when the registrant knowingly submitted a false statement of material fact
  • decision that mark submitted with application was materially different relied on Board’s decision that the mark created a different commercial impression
  • “Fraud in obtaining renewal of a registration amounts to fraud in obtaining a registration within the meaning of section 14(c) of the Lan- ham Act.”
  • “Fraud in obtaining renewal of a registration amounts to fraud in obtaining a registration within the meaning of section 14(c) of the Lan- ham Act.”
  • court found it material that specimen submitted for Section 9 renewal application was not currently in use and cancelled the registration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Miller, Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.