Miguel Padilla Palacios v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the rationale of Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 840 (1991), to the parallel provisions in 21 U.S.C. § 960
• applying the rationale of Gozlon-Peretz to the parallel provisions in 21 U.S.C. § 960
• applying the rationale of Gozlon-Peretz to the parallel provisions in 21 U.S.C. § 960

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).