Second Circuit· 2/26/2003

Miguel Miranda v. Floyd Bennett

Citations

322 F.3d 171
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3481
2003 WL 492792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the “very nature of advocacy creates a need for the court to be wary of wholesale adoption of a party’s proffers”
noting that the \very nature of advocacy creates a need for the court to be wary of wholesale adoption of a party's proffers\
describing the benefit to- the circuit court and the parties of having the district court’s complete analysis
“Generally when the Appellate Division opinion states that a group of contentions is either without merit ‘or’ procedurally barred, the decision does not disclose which claim in the group has been rejected on which ground.”
“[S]pecification by the [trial] court of its findings of fact and conclusions of law informs the losing litigant of the reason for that court’s ruling and of the principal questions that he must address if he appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Sack, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.