Miguel Medrano v. Excel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiffs witnesses had testified at length about the terms of the CBA and that plaintiff “was not challenging the actions of his employers under [state law]; instead he was challenging a provision of the CBA that was applied by his employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).