Skip to main content
· 8/30/1913

Migge v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 75 Wash. 197
  • 134 P. 815
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1697

Syllabus

<p>Carriers — Injury to Passengers — Alighting—Negligence—Question for Jury. In an action by a passenger, injured in alighting from a railway train, the negligence of the railway company is for the jury, where it appears that a footstool for passengers to step upon in alighting was placed upon uneven ground in such a manner as to be unsteady, causing a heavy woman to fall and break her ankle (Morris, J., dissenting).</p> <p>Appeal — Preservation of Grounds — Motion for New Trial — Necessity. Objection to a verdict as excessive cannot be raised in the supreme court in the absence of a motion for a new trial on that ground.</p>

Judges: Main, Morris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.