· 4/25/1988
M.I.G. Investments, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 523 N.E.2d 1
- 122 Ill. 2d 392
- 119 Ill. Dec. 533
- 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21382
- 1988 Ill. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
- implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
- implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
- explaining the transition of the role of siting from the Agency to local governmental authorities
- referring to the landfill for which the operator sought an expansion of the vertical boundary as “an existing landfill facility”
- boundaries generally involve lateral, not vertical measurement, but exception is made for solid waste fill, which has boundaries expressed in altitude
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ward, Moran, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.