Skip to main content
· 4/25/1988

M.I.G. Investments, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 523 N.E.2d 1
  • 122 Ill. 2d 392
  • 119 Ill. Dec. 533
  • 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21382
  • 1988 Ill. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
  • implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
  • implying that whether a change to a facility impacts the siting and hearing requirements is a factor in determining whether that change should trigger them
  • explaining the transition of the role of siting from the Agency to local governmental authorities
  • referring to the landfill for which the operator sought an expansion of the vertical boundary as “an existing landfill facility”
  • boundaries generally involve lateral, not vertical measurement, but exception is made for solid waste fill, which has boundaries expressed in altitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward, Moran, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.