Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/24/1996

Miedema v. Dial Corp.

Citations

551 N.W.2d 309
1996 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 372
1996 WL 411862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that claimant’s back injury arose in the course of employment, but it did not arise out of his employment
holding that claimant's back injury arose in the course of employment, but it did not arise out of his employment
concluding that despite the fact that the employee’s back strain occurred in the course of employment, the fact that the employee strained his back while using the restroom was not a hazard associated with his employment and thus did not arise out of his employment
holding injury occurred in the course of employment when employee was on his employer’s premises during normal working hours, and was about to perform his required duties when he unexpectedly strained his back
affirming denial of workers’ compensation benefits to an employee who injured his back when flushing a toilet at work
requiring a \causal connection ... between the conditions of his employment and the injury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGlverin, Lavorato, Snell, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.