Midwest Soya International, Inc. v. Jeffrey Alan Leerar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the discretionary decision bar did not’ apply to decisions made discretionary by regulation
• holding that section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) barred jurisdiction of decisions specified by statute as discretionary but did not bar decisions specified by regulation as discretionary
• holding that the court has no jurisdiction to review the denial of a continuance
• concluding that INA § 242(a)(2)(B), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B), does not strip courts of jurisdiction to review denials of motions to reopen or reconsider made pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
• recognizing the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the INA bar “review of discretionary deci sions only when Congress itself set out the Attorney General’s discretionary authority in the statute”
• noting that BIA decisions must be accorded \due respect\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).