Midwest Mutual Insurance Co. v. Titus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment was appropriate on this coverage question
• “There was no evidence that [child] was a resident of or temporarily absent from her father’s household, having had no presence in it.”
• “There was no evidence that [child] was a resident of or temporarily absent from her father’s household, having had no presence in it.”
• \Consideration of all relevant cireamstances must reveal 'some intended presence in the insured's home'\
• “Consideration of all relevant circumstances must reveal ‘some intended presence in the insured’s home.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).