Midwest Grinding Co., Inc. v. Spitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a factor to consider when determining if a pattern exists is whether there is a definite conclusion to defendant’s conduct
• noting that the Seventh Circuit has not found continuity in any ease since H.J. Inc.
• noting that where defendant’s conduct threatens plaintiff and was not a societal threat, then RICO should not apply and plaintiff should consider other common law claims
• pointing out that, in each case since H.J. Inc., the Seventh Circuit has not found the necessary continuity to establish a pattern of racketeering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).