Midwest Concrete Products Co. v. La Salle National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while the subcontract stated it was “subject to” the terms of the general contract entered into with the entity that occupied and used the property, that entity was not a third-party beneficiary of the subcontract
• finding that while the subcontract stated it was “ ‘subject to’ ” the terms of the general contract entered into with the entity that occupied and used the property, that entity was not a third-party beneficiary of the subcontract
• benefit to third person must at least be direct result of performance of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).