Skip to main content
· 4/19/1984

Midway Airlines, Inc. v. County of Westchester

Citations

  • 584 F. Supp. 436
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding application for access to airport in abeyance was a valid exercise of proprietary powers because airport board was not banning a particular user from the airport, only asking for adequate time to formulate plans to allocate scarce resources
  • holding application for access to airport in abeyance was a valid exercise of proprietary powers because airport board was not banning a particular user from the airport, only asking for adequate time to formulate plans to allocate scarce resources
  • extensive facts supporting the determination that the airport was congested
  • extensive facts supporting the determination that the airport was congested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward Weinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.