Midland Judicial District Community Supervision & Corrections Department v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that written statements that employee’s salary increases were contingent on future performance evaluations did not rebut the at-will presumption
• holding offer letter that contained statements of annual salary and general statement that salary is based on future performance did not create employment contract
• holding offer letter that contained statements of annual salary and general statement that salary is based on future performance did not create employment contract
• holding employer entitled to summary judgment because employment was at will even though memorandum listed quarterly salary adjustments for a year and employee was terminated after three months’ employment
• holding employer entitled to summary judgment because employment was at will even though memorandum listed quarterly salary adjustments for a year and employee was terminated after three months’ employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).