Skip to main content
· 11/13/1986

Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.

Citations

  • 499 N.E.2d 792
  • 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 3133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lower court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest and trebling the interest along with the other damages
  • holding that lower court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest and trebling the interest along with the other damages
  • “This statute is largely a penal measure and as such it must be strictly construed.”
  • mens rea differentiates criminal conversion from innocent breach of contract or failure to pay debt
  • mens rea differentiates criminal conversion from innocent breach of contract or failure to pay debt
  • observ- ing that the State must prove “not only that [defendant] exerted unauthorized control over . . . property, but also that [defendant] was aware of a high probability that this control was unauthorized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman, Staton, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.