Midland-Guardian Co. v. Hagin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion in not allowing plaintiff to reopen its case, before final judgment -5- was entered, to introduce documents that were already attached to complaint
• holding that trial court abused its discretion in not allowing plaintiff to reopen its case, before final judgment -5- was entered, to introduce documents that were already attached to complaint
• abuse of discretion to deny motion to reopen case to introduce note, reinstallment contract and assignment, where documents were already in court file and copies had been attached to complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).