Midland Garment Manufacturing Co. v. Peetz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Government’s failure to disavow application of the challenged provision [is] a factor in favor of a finding of standing”
• concluding that “failure to disavow ‘is an attitudinal factor the net effect of which would seem to impart some substance to the fears of plaintiffs’ ” (brackets omitted
• concluding that \failure to disavow `is an attitudinal factor the net effect of which would seem to impart some substance to the fears of plaintiffs'\ (brackets omitted
• stating that 13 “past instances of enforcement” and the “Government’s failure to disavow application of 14 the challenged provision” are “important” factors to consider in a standing inquiry
• finding a credible threat of prosecution in part because \LSO has already engaged in self-censorship\
• analyzing standing to seek injunctive and declaratory relief in same way regarding injury in fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).