Skip to main content
· 9/21/2006

Midland Central Appraisal District v. Plains Marketing, L.P.

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 469
  • 169 Oil & Gas Rep. 220
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 8251
  • 2006 WL 2692721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a party may not protest on one ground to the appraisal review board but assert a different ground before the district court
  • holding it unnecessary to consider adequacy of notices of protest because the court’s task was to determine whether the appraisal review board considered party’s exemption claim
  • “Courts have recognized that the legislature rejected hypertechnieal requirements for challenges to appraisal values when it adopted the current tax protest mechanism.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Mecall, Strange

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.