Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/17/2024
Midlam v. Demartino
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2301
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus where the petition did not contain any facially valid claims. Res judicata barred appellant from relitigating issues through his habeas petition that were already adjudicated in his previous appeals.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 432×
- State ex rel. Cannon v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-10-17· cited 82×
- State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-05-26· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Rash v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-12· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-07-01· cited 15×
- McKinney v. Haviland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 12×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-01· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Fuller v. Eppinger (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-10· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Richard v. MohrOhio Supreme Court· 2013-04-16· cited 6×
- State v. MidlamOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-28· cited 5×
- State v. MidlamOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.