MidFirst Bank v. Stump
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 4312
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment or when granting partial summary judgment on the issue of the enforceability of the mortgage signed by appellant. The language of the mortgage was unambiguous and clearly expressed an intent to grant a security interest in appellant's interest in the property. Although the notary's acknowledgement failed to include appellant's signature with that of her husband, this defect did not render the mortgage unenforceable between the parties.
Judges: Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.