Middleton v. Wallichs Music & Entertainment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant did not engage in allegedly interfering conduct until “the terminal stages of these inducing efforts by the lessor”
• “The mere fact that [defendant] contracted with the lessor with knowledge of the existence of the restrictive [competition] covenant and its possible breach by lessor in entering into the subsequent lease with [defendant], is not ... the equivalent of improper inducement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).