Middleton v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding new allegations were “substantially similar” to publicly disclosed allegations because “they allege the same underlying scheme, but as applied to a new time period” (emphasis added)
• granting leave to amend and noting that \it would make little sense not to allow a relator to obtain these details [about the start and end date of a fraud] during discovery and amend her complaint accordingly.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).