· 5/1/1985
Middleton v. Murff
Citations
- 689 S.W.2d 212
- 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 396
- 1985 Tex. LEXIS 840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment
- recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
- recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
- recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
- holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment
- holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.