Skip to main content
· 5/1/1985

Middleton v. Murff

Citations

  • 689 S.W.2d 212
  • 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 396
  • 1985 Tex. LEXIS 840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment
  • recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
  • recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
  • recognizing that if trial court lacks jurisdictional power, bill of review not required to challenge void judgment
  • holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment
  • holding that when party failed to establish that court lacked jurisdictional power to render judgment, bill of review is exclusive remedy to set aside judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.