Skip to main content
· 10/2/1997

Middlemist v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Citations

  • 958 P.2d 486
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2117
  • 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 226
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,098
  • 1997 WL 603886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an appellant must identify specific errors and legal authorities supporting reversal
  • noting the appellant’s obligation to identify the specific errors and legal authorities that would support reversal
  • declining to address the propriety of the trial court’s order where the plaintiff “fail[ed] to identify any specific errors committed by the trial court”
  • noting the appellant’s obligation to identify the specific errors and legal authorities that would support reversal
  • declining to address the propriety of the trial court’s order where the plaintiff “fail[ed] to identify any specific errors committed by the trial court”
  • dismissing, on summary judgment, plaintiff’s claims for negligent hiring and supervision that sought damages for emotional pain and suffering and mental anguish based on plaintiff’s firing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquez, Metzger, Criswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.