· 10/2/1997
Middlemist v. BDO Seidman, LLP
Citations
- 958 P.2d 486
- 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2117
- 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 226
- 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,098
- 1997 WL 603886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an appellant must identify specific errors and legal authorities supporting reversal
- noting the appellant’s obligation to identify the specific errors and legal authorities that would support reversal
- declining to address the propriety of the trial court’s order where the plaintiff “fail[ed] to identify any specific errors committed by the trial court”
- noting the appellant’s obligation to identify the specific errors and legal authorities that would support reversal
- declining to address the propriety of the trial court’s order where the plaintiff “fail[ed] to identify any specific errors committed by the trial court”
- dismissing, on summary judgment, plaintiff’s claims for negligent hiring and supervision that sought damages for emotional pain and suffering and mental anguish based on plaintiff’s firing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquez, Metzger, Criswell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.