Skip to main content
· 7/7/1988

Middlebrooks v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MGT. DIST.

Citations

  • 529 So. 2d 1167
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1608
  • 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911
  • 1988 WL 68502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that withdrawal of application for a consumptive use permit was not timely under the voluntary dismissal rule, and would “afford him the advantage of 20/20 hindsight” that no other party under the rule is allowed to have
  • a withdrawal divests the agency of jurisdiction and prevents it from taking further action in the matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.