Skip to main content
· 12/11/1995

Middleborough Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-Owners v. Montedison S.P.A.

Citations

  • 465 S.E.2d 765
  • 320 S.C. 470
  • 1995 S.C. App. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding summary judgment was appropriate because the nonmoving party \advance[d] no good reason why four months was insufficient time under the facts of this case to develop documentation in opposition to the motion for summary judgment\
  • sustaining a summary judgment in part because the defendants “advance[d] no good reason why four months was insufficient time to develop documentation in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.”
  • affirming summary judgment where the appellants \advance[d] no good reason why four months was insufficient time under the facts of this case to develop documentation in opposition to the motion for summary judgment\
  • affirming summary judgment when appellants \advance[d] no good reason why four months was [an] insufficient [amount of] time under the facts of [that] case to develop documentation in opposition to the motion for summary judgment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cureton, Goolsby, Hearn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.