Skip to main content
· 6/21/2002

Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District v. Norton

Citations

  • 294 F.3d 1220
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20734
  • 54 ERC (BNA) 1897
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12350
  • 2002 WL 1354123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving injunction where agency \failed to consider important aspects of the problem before\ it
  • approving injunc- tion where agency “failed to consider important aspects of the problem before” it
  • \[A] reviewing court normally remands when it finds an agency's decision not to conduct an EIS arbitrary or capricious.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McKay, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.