· 6/21/2002
Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District v. Norton
Citations
- 294 F.3d 1220
- 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20734
- 54 ERC (BNA) 1897
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12350
- 2002 WL 1354123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving injunction where agency \failed to consider important aspects of the problem before\ it
- approving injunc- tion where agency “failed to consider important aspects of the problem before” it
- \[A] reviewing court normally remands when it finds an agency's decision not to conduct an EIS arbitrary or capricious.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, McKay, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.