· 7/12/2013
MidAmerican Pension & Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee v. Cox
Citations
- 720 F.3d 715
- 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2734
- 2013 WL 3481206
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful, and effective meaning to all the terms is preferred to an interpretation which leaves a part unreasonable, unlawful, or of no effect” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 203(a) (1981))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Beam, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.