Skip to main content
· 7/12/2013

MidAmerican Pension & Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee v. Cox

Citations

  • 720 F.3d 715
  • 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2734
  • 2013 WL 3481206
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful, and effective meaning to all the terms is preferred to an interpretation which leaves a part unreasonable, unlawful, or of no effect” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 203(a) (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Beam, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.