MID-STATE CONTRACTPRS, INC. v. Halo Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim of lien could be enforced without stating the specific amount owed and remanding to the trial court to determine if the lienee was adversely affected by the omission
• holding that the “technical fulfillment” of the statutory requirements in a claim of lien is not required where lienor substantially complied with requisites and there is no showing of prejudice against owner
• holding that the party against whom the lien is asserted has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it has been adversely affected by the error or omission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).