Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Third Coast Packaging Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that care, custody or control exclusion barred coverage because underlying petitions alleged that property was “in possession” or in “care, custody, and control” of insured when it was damaged
• ruling that an insurance policy covering liability for \damages\ related to bodily injuries or property damage unambiguously does not cover costs associated with fighting a fire, cleaning up after a fire, premises security or pollution monitoring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).