Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Roger Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding workers were independent contractors despite 17 and 18 year tenures where they got paid only if they worked
• “[When] there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “[W]here there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (citation omitted)
• “[W]here there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quoting Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573–74 (1985)
• “In an appeal from a district court’s final judgment following a bench trial, we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and review conclusions of law de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).