Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Four-Four, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that \the doe-trine of law of the case tracks with ... Utah Rule[ ] of Civil Procedure\ 54(b
• requiring a court to reconsider a previously decided issue when there is new evidence
• “We consider extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intentions only if the contractual language is ambiguous.”
• \The district courts have jurisdiction to review by trial de novo all final agency actions resulting from informal adjudicative proceedings.\
• \[A] contract provision is not necessarily ambiguous just because one party gives that provision a different meaning than another party does.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).