Skip to main content
· 3/29/2010

Microvote General Corp. v. Indiana Election Commission

Citations

  • 924 N.E.2d 184
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 514
  • 2010 WL 1189377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] party is not allowed to split a cause of action, pur- suing it in a piecemeal fashion and subjecting a defendant to needless multiple suits.”
  • “[A] party is not allowed to split a cause of action, pur- suing it in a piecemeal fashion and subjecting a defendant to needless multiple suits.”
  • “The term [privy] includes those who control an action, though not a party to it, and those whose interests are represented by a party to the action.”
  • “[I]n determining the parties for res judicata purposes, . . . court[s] look[] beyond the nominal parties and treat[] those whose interest[s] are involved as the real parties.”
  • “The doctrine of res judicata bars the litigation of a claim after a final judgment has been rendered in a prior action involving the same claim between the same parties or their privies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Vaidik, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.